Codex to explore its statements of principle on role of science to help find consensus on controversial issues
An informal meeting held online on Wednesday 2 February 2022 began to explore how a Codex Executive sub-committee will approach their task to provide operational guidance on the statements of principle in the Procedural Manual concerning the role of science in the Codex decision-making process and the extent to which other factors are taken into account.
The statements being considered uphold science while recognizing the relevance of so-called “other factors” when setting standards in Codex. Examples of those factors include constraints, especially in developing countries regarding production or processing methods or even economic interests and trade issues if backed up by data.
In what Tom Heilandt, Codex Secretary, defined as “deep Codex … work that really goes to the core of Codex”, participants will be asked to outline a way forward that will later be suggested to the wider membership and hopefully contribute to break the deadlock on setting maximum residue limits for growth hormone promoters such as zilpaterol.
Steve Wearne, Chairperson of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, opening the meeting, said he was working with the three vice-chairpersons “to ensure an inclusive, transparent and resilient Codex that is respected across the world for its commitment to consensus-driven and science-based standards.”
The sub-committee will be led by Vice-Chairperson, Raj Rajasekar from New Zealand. “I have no illusions about the complexities and the challenges” of this work, he said. “The subject matter itself may not be new. But what I do believe we are trying to do here is see if we can find a different approach.”
The sub-committee will work to see how to address not merely the challenges that have been the focus of the statements of principle in the past, but also to see, said Rajasekar, “whether they have a much broader relevance and application in a rapidly changing world where we are facing a lot of different issues and challenges.”
Promoting a common understanding of the principles and developing practical guidance, ultimately to Codex chairpersons, will be a step forward for Codex in consensus-based decision making and the development of standards.
Learn more
Executive Committee paper on the Statements of Principle published in October 2021
Photo credit
© FAO/Luis Tato
At the heart of the Codex mandate are the core values of collaboration, inclusiveness, consensus building and transparency. Governmental and non-governmental, public and private organizations alike play a vital role in ensuring Codex texts are of the highest quality and based on sound science.
Codex would have little authority in the field of international standard setting if it did not welcome and acknowledge the valuable contributions made by observers. Expert technical bodies, industry and consumer associations
contribute to the standard-setting process in a spirit of openness, collaboration and transparency.
Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can apply for observer status in Codex in order to attend and put forward their views at every stage of the standard-setting process.
Current Codex Alimentarius Commission
Codex to explore its statements of principle on role of science to help find consensus on controversial issues
An informal meeting held online on Wednesday 2 February 2022 began to explore how a Codex Executive sub-committee will approach their task to provide operational guidance on the statements of principle in the Procedural Manual concerning the role of science in the Codex decision-making process and the extent to which other factors are taken into account.
The statements being considered uphold science while recognizing the relevance of so-called “other factors” when setting standards in Codex. Examples of those factors include constraints, especially in developing countries regarding production or processing methods or even economic interests and trade issues if backed up by data.
In what Tom Heilandt, Codex Secretary, defined as “deep Codex … work that really goes to the core of Codex”, participants will be asked to outline a way forward that will later be suggested to the wider membership and hopefully contribute to break the deadlock on setting maximum residue limits for growth hormone promoters such as zilpaterol.
Steve Wearne, Chairperson of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, opening the meeting, said he was working with the three vice-chairpersons “to ensure an inclusive, transparent and resilient Codex that is respected across the world for its commitment to consensus-driven and science-based standards.”
The sub-committee will be led by Vice-Chairperson, Raj Rajasekar from New Zealand. “I have no illusions about the complexities and the challenges” of this work, he said. “The subject matter itself may not be new. But what I do believe we are trying to do here is see if we can find a different approach.”
The sub-committee will work to see how to address not merely the challenges that have been the focus of the statements of principle in the past, but also to see, said Rajasekar, “whether they have a much broader relevance and application in a rapidly changing world where we are facing a lot of different issues and challenges.”
Promoting a common understanding of the principles and developing practical guidance, ultimately to Codex chairpersons, will be a step forward for Codex in consensus-based decision making and the development of standards.
Learn more
Executive Committee paper on the Statements of Principle published in October 2021
Photo credit
© FAO/Luis Tato
Codex and Observer
around the world since ancient times.
We might not always know where it comes from,
but we expect it to be available, safe and of good quality.
Leave a comment