Steve Wearne talks AMR for Codex

Nov 13, 2017, 09:16 AM by System

Steve Wearne is Director of Policy and Science Group at the UK Food Standards Agency and In July 2017 he was elected as Vice Chair of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. He also chaired the 2016 Codex physical Working Group on antimicrobial resistance in London.  

Steve Wearne - Vice chair Codex Alimentarius Commission

For Antimicrobial Awareness Week we spoke to Steve about the importance of antimicrobial resistance as an issue, about the agricultural use of antimicrobials, and about national and international action on the issue, of which the work of Codex Alimentarius forms a vital part.

Just how important is antimicrobial resistance – or AMR – as an issue?

Put simply, the emergence of AMR poses a significant global threat that might change the very nature of medicine.  Lord O’Neill, in his authoritative report commissioned by the UK Government, says that without action at the global level, by the middle of this century there would be an extra 10 million deaths each year as a result of AMR and it will overtake cancer as the biggest cause of death. 

So, is agricultural use of antimicrobials an issue?

Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic resistant bacteria can be transmitted from livestock to humans via food consumption, or via direct contact with animals or their waste in the environment.  Any mechanism that helps spread bacteria has the potential to transfer resistant bacteria.   

And so the food distribution network is a theoretical risk pathway for transmission and spread from animals to humans. Despite this, direct evidence for AMR in humans resulting from consumption of food products is very limited. So our knowledge is incomplete.  However, there is an increasingly robust consensus that unnecessary use of antimicrobials in animals and agriculture is a significant concern, and that minimising the unnecessary and inappropriate use of antimicrobials is an essential component of global AMR strategies.

So, what is happening?

Well, the world is waking up to AMR risks. There has been a huge effort at the international level to drive forward the AMR agenda over the past 2-3 years.  Last September’s declaration on AMR by the UN General Assembly is a real milestone.

Here in the UK, we have committed to achieving a target for multispecies average use of antibiotics of 50 mg/kg by 2018, which represents a 20% reduction in use in four years.  We are also setting sector specific reduction targets this year so that future reductions are greatest where there is most scope.  We are setting rules for antibiotics which are most critically important for human health, reserving their use in animals as a last resort, and only where there is a diagnosed disease, no alternative treatment and only after conducting an antibiotic susceptibility test.

The UK has also committed US$375m to the Fleming Fund to improve disease surveillance, focused on drug-resistant infections in low and middle-income countries. 

And what is the role of Codex Alimentarius?

The Codex Alimentarius Commission agreed in July 2016 to re-establish the Intergovernmental Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance in order to revise and update the Codex code of practice on AMR and, for the first time, to set guidelines for integrated AMR surveillance that can be adopted by Codex member countries in a stepwise manner to reflect their capabilities.  These new texts would complement the national plans that many countries are developing, rather than distract from them.

I was honoured to chair the physical Working Group in London in November and December 2016, along with my co-chairs from Australia and the USA.  We succeeded in achieving a broad consensus in London on the project documentation that sets the scope of this new work.  I’m hopeful that this can provide a firm basis for the work to be done.

We also identified the important role that science has to play in underpinning the work of the Task Force, and set out some initial science priorities for FAO and WHO.  

Momentum is now key.  We need to focus our efforts on preparing for the first meeting of the Task Force later this year, and do all we can to assure its success.

Links

AMR week at FAO

AMR week at WHO

 

At the heart of the Codex mandate are the core values of collaboration, inclusiveness, consensus building and transparency. Governmental and non-governmental, public and private organizations alike play a vital role in ensuring Codex texts are of the highest quality and based on sound science.

Codex would have little authority in the field of international standard setting if it did not welcome and acknowledge the valuable contributions made by observers. Expert technical bodies, industry and consumer associations contribute to the standard-setting process in a spirit of openness, collaboration and transparency.

Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can apply for observer status in Codex in order to attend and put forward their views at every stage of the standard-setting process.

Current Codex Alimentarius Commission

240
Codex Observers
60
IGOs
164
NGOs
16
UN

Steve Wearne talks AMR for Codex

Nov 13, 2017, 09:16 AM by System

Steve Wearne is Director of Policy and Science Group at the UK Food Standards Agency and In July 2017 he was elected as Vice Chair of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. He also chaired the 2016 Codex physical Working Group on antimicrobial resistance in London.  

Steve Wearne - Vice chair Codex Alimentarius Commission

For Antimicrobial Awareness Week we spoke to Steve about the importance of antimicrobial resistance as an issue, about the agricultural use of antimicrobials, and about national and international action on the issue, of which the work of Codex Alimentarius forms a vital part.

Just how important is antimicrobial resistance – or AMR – as an issue?

Put simply, the emergence of AMR poses a significant global threat that might change the very nature of medicine.  Lord O’Neill, in his authoritative report commissioned by the UK Government, says that without action at the global level, by the middle of this century there would be an extra 10 million deaths each year as a result of AMR and it will overtake cancer as the biggest cause of death. 

So, is agricultural use of antimicrobials an issue?

Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic resistant bacteria can be transmitted from livestock to humans via food consumption, or via direct contact with animals or their waste in the environment.  Any mechanism that helps spread bacteria has the potential to transfer resistant bacteria.   

And so the food distribution network is a theoretical risk pathway for transmission and spread from animals to humans. Despite this, direct evidence for AMR in humans resulting from consumption of food products is very limited. So our knowledge is incomplete.  However, there is an increasingly robust consensus that unnecessary use of antimicrobials in animals and agriculture is a significant concern, and that minimising the unnecessary and inappropriate use of antimicrobials is an essential component of global AMR strategies.

So, what is happening?

Well, the world is waking up to AMR risks. There has been a huge effort at the international level to drive forward the AMR agenda over the past 2-3 years.  Last September’s declaration on AMR by the UN General Assembly is a real milestone.

Here in the UK, we have committed to achieving a target for multispecies average use of antibiotics of 50 mg/kg by 2018, which represents a 20% reduction in use in four years.  We are also setting sector specific reduction targets this year so that future reductions are greatest where there is most scope.  We are setting rules for antibiotics which are most critically important for human health, reserving their use in animals as a last resort, and only where there is a diagnosed disease, no alternative treatment and only after conducting an antibiotic susceptibility test.

The UK has also committed US$375m to the Fleming Fund to improve disease surveillance, focused on drug-resistant infections in low and middle-income countries. 

And what is the role of Codex Alimentarius?

The Codex Alimentarius Commission agreed in July 2016 to re-establish the Intergovernmental Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance in order to revise and update the Codex code of practice on AMR and, for the first time, to set guidelines for integrated AMR surveillance that can be adopted by Codex member countries in a stepwise manner to reflect their capabilities.  These new texts would complement the national plans that many countries are developing, rather than distract from them.

I was honoured to chair the physical Working Group in London in November and December 2016, along with my co-chairs from Australia and the USA.  We succeeded in achieving a broad consensus in London on the project documentation that sets the scope of this new work.  I’m hopeful that this can provide a firm basis for the work to be done.

We also identified the important role that science has to play in underpinning the work of the Task Force, and set out some initial science priorities for FAO and WHO.  

Momentum is now key.  We need to focus our efforts on preparing for the first meeting of the Task Force later this year, and do all we can to assure its success.

Links

AMR week at FAO

AMR week at WHO

 

Codex and Observer

Food is a sensitive commodity, which has travelled
around the world since ancient times.
We might not always know where it comes from,
but we expect it to be available, safe and of good quality.